Bunjil vs Latham
Side-by-side tap water quality comparison
Which suburb has better water?
Latham has better water quality with a score of 9.3/10 compared to Bunjil's 8.5/10. Bunjil has softer water (120 vs 204 mg/L).
Based on ADWG compliance across all measured parameters. Both suburbs receive treated, safe drinking water.
Visual comparison
Key metrics comparison
Full water quality comparison
All parameters compared against Australian Drinking Water Guidelines (ADWG)
| Parameter | Bunjil | Latham | Unit | ADWG Guideline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alkalinity | 63.3 Measured | 174 Measured | mg/L CaCO3 | No limit |
| Aluminium | 0.013 Good | 0.008 Good | mg/L | < 0.2 |
| Chloride | 400 Exceeds | 157 Good | mg/L | < 250 |
| Colour | 1 Good | 1 Good | HU | < 15 |
| Fluoride | 0.78 Good | 0.84 Good | mg/L | < 1.5 |
| Hardness | 120 Good | 204 Exceeds | mg/L CaCO3 | < 200 |
| Iron | 0.107 Good | 0.017 Good | mg/L | < 0.3 |
| Manganese | 0.005 Good | 0.007 Good | mg/L | < 0.1 |
| Nitrate | 2.6 Good | 7.5 Good | mg/L | < 50 |
| pH | 7.76 Normal | 7.64 Normal | pH units | 6.5 – 8.5 |
| Sodium | 253 Exceeds | 82 Good | mg/L | < 180 |
| Sulfate | 57 Good | 14 Good | mg/L | < 500 |
| Total Dissolved Solids | 858 Exceeds | 576 Near limit | mg/L | < 600 |
| Trihalomethanes | 0.038 Good | 0.053 Good | mg/L | < 0.25 |
| Turbidity | 0.1 Good | 0.3 Good | NTU | < 5 |
Explore further
Disclaimer: This comparison is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice or professional guidance. Data is sourced from Water Corporation. Values shown are based on the most recent published water quality reports and may not reflect real-time conditions at your tap. Water quality can vary due to local plumbing, seasonal changes, and other factors. For specific health concerns, consult a qualified health professional or contact your local water utility. See our Terms of Use.