Auburn vs Camberwell
Side-by-side tap water quality comparison
Which suburb has better water?
It's very close! Auburn scores 9.5/10 and Camberwell scores 9.4/10. Both suburbs have similar water quality based on ADWG compliance data.
Visual comparison
Key metrics comparison
Full water quality comparison
All parameters compared against Australian Drinking Water Guidelines (ADWG)
| Parameter | Auburn | Camberwell | Unit | ADWG Guideline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aluminium | — | 0.024 Good | mg/L | < 0.2 |
| Colour | 2 Good | — | HU | < 15 |
| Copper | — | 0.027 Good | mg/L | < 2 |
| E. coli | 0 Compliant | 0 Compliant | MPN/100mL | < 0 |
| Electrical Conductivity | 65 Measured | — | No limit | |
| Fluoride | 0.79 Good | 0.78 Good | mg/L | < 1.5 |
| Free Chlorine | 0.65 Good | 0.46 Good | mg/L | < 5 |
| Hardness | 16 Good | 17 Good | mg/L CaCO3 | < 200 |
| Iron | 0.06 Good | 0.061 Good | mg/L | < 0.3 |
| Lead | — | 0.0008 Good | mg/L | < 0.01 |
| Manganese | 0.004 Good | — | mg/L | < 0.1 |
| pH | 7.4 Normal | 7.3 Normal | pH units | 6.5 – 8.5 |
| Sodium | 4.9 Good | — | mg/L | < 180 |
| Total Chlorine | 0.8 Good | — | mg/L | < 5 |
| Trihalomethanes | 0.063 Good | 0.07 Good | mg/L | < 0.25 |
| Turbidity | 0.8 Good | 2.3 Good | NTU | < 5 |
| Zinc | — | 0.022 Measured | mg/L | No limit |
Explore further
Disclaimer: This comparison is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice or professional guidance. Data is sourced from Yarra Valley Water. Values shown are based on the most recent published water quality reports and may not reflect real-time conditions at your tap. Water quality can vary due to local plumbing, seasonal changes, and other factors. For specific health concerns, consult a qualified health professional or contact your local water utility. See our Terms of Use.