Beaconsfield Upper vs Pakenham Upper
Side-by-side tap water quality comparison
Which suburb has better water?
It's very close! Beaconsfield Upper scores 9.3/10 and Pakenham Upper scores 9.2/10. Both suburbs have similar water quality based on ADWG compliance data.
Visual comparison
Key metrics comparison
Full water quality comparison
All parameters compared against Australian Drinking Water Guidelines (ADWG)
| Parameter | Beaconsfield Upper | Pakenham Upper | Unit | ADWG Guideline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colour | — | 7.3 Good | HU | < 15 |
| Fluoride | 0.77 Good | 0.79 Good | mg/L | < 1.5 |
| Free Chlorine | 0.94 Good | 0.75 Good | mg/L | < 5 |
| Iron | 0.03 Good | 0.03 Good | mg/L | < 0.3 |
| Manganese | 0.002 Good | 0.002 Good | mg/L | < 0.1 |
| Trihalomethanes | 0.028 Good | 0.032 Good | mg/L | < 0.25 |
| Turbidity | 2 Good | 2 Good | NTU | < 5 |
Explore further
Beaconsfield Upper
Disclaimer: This comparison is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice or professional guidance. Data is sourced from South East Water. Values shown are based on the most recent published water quality reports and may not reflect real-time conditions at your tap. Water quality can vary due to local plumbing, seasonal changes, and other factors. For specific health concerns, consult a qualified health professional or contact your local water utility. See our Terms of Use.