Buckingham vs Padthaway

Name: Water Quality Comparison: Buckingham vs Padthaway
Creator: WaterScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Side-by-side tap water quality comparison

Padthaway, SA

8.0

Quality Score

Supplied by SA Water

Share this page Twitter Facebook LinkedIn

Which suburb has better water?

Buckingham has better water quality with a score of 9.4/10 compared to Padthaway's 8.0/10. Buckingham has softer water (272 vs 602 mg/L).

Based on ADWG compliance across all measured parameters. Both suburbs receive treated, safe drinking water.

As an Amazon Associate, WaterScore earns from qualifying purchases. We may also earn from other affiliate links on this page — this doesn't affect our recommendations.

Recommended for this suburb

Padthaway's tap water is 'very hard' at 602 mg/L — and scale is building up in your home right now.

Every time you boil a kettle or run the hot tap, calcium is baking onto heating elements. Hot water systems, dishwashers, coffee machines, shower screens and glassware all take the same damage. "Descaler tablets" treat the symptom; they don't stop the mineral from entering your home in the first place.

iSpringOur pick

RCC7AK 6-Stage Under-Sink RO (with Alkaline Re-min)

4.6 · 13,756 ratings on Amazon

A reverse-osmosis system blocks 95%+ of dissolved minerals before the water reaches your tap. No plumber needed — it fits under the kitchen sink in a Saturday. The drinking water, ice, tea and coffee all taste clean for the first time. Reducing scale at the tap helps protect the appliances you use every day.

Stop the scale →

Sponsored Amazon link · we may earn a commission at no cost to you. Check Amazon for current price and availability.

Visual comparison

Buckingham, SA

Padthaway, SA

Key metrics comparison

Hardness (mg/L)

Buckingham

272 Lower

Padthaway

602 Higher

pH Level

Buckingham

—

Padthaway

7.6 Normal

Fluoride (mg/L)

Buckingham

0.3 Higher

Padthaway

0.1 Lower

Chlorine (mg/L)

Buckingham

1.1 Higher

Padthaway

0.9 Lower

Full water quality comparison

All parameters compared against Australian Drinking Water Guidelines (ADWG)

Parameter	Buckingham	Padthaway	Unit	ADWG Guideline
Alkalinity	285 Measured	381 Measured	mg/L	No limit
Aluminium	0.002 Good	0.001 Good	mg/L	< 0.2
Calcium	75.7 Measured	159 Measured	mg/L	No limit
Chloride	101 Good	662 Exceeds	mg/L	< 250
Colour	1 Good	1 Good	HU	< 15
Copper	0.0045 Good	0.032 Good	mg/L	< 2
E. coli	0 Compliant	0 Compliant	cfu/100mL	< 0
Fluoride	0.3 Good	0.1 Good	mg/L	< 1.5
Free Chlorine	1.1 Good	0.9 Good	mg/L	< 5
Hardness	272 Exceeds	602 Exceeds	PPM or mg/L	< 200
Iron	0.0031 Good	0.0128 Good	mg/L	< 0.3
Lead	0.0003 Good	0.0007 Good	mg/L	< 0.01
Magnesium	20.1 Measured	49.7 Measured	mg/L	No limit
Manganese	0.0001 Good	0.001 Good	mg/L	< 0.1
Nitrate	1.24 Good	0.57 Good	mg/L	< 50
pH	—	7.6 Normal	pH units	6.5 – 8.5
Sodium	78.1 Good	360 Exceeds	mg/L	< 180
Sulfate	15.3 Good	78.1 Good	mg/L	< 500
Total Chlorine	1.1 Good	—	mg/L	< 5
Total Dissolved Solids	438 Good	—	mg/L	< 600
Turbidity	0.1 Good	0.12 Good	NTU	< 5

Explore further

Buckingham

Padthaway

Disclaimer: This comparison is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice or professional guidance. Data is sourced from SA Water. Values shown are based on the most recent published water quality reports and may not reflect real-time conditions at your tap. Water quality can vary due to local plumbing, seasonal changes, and other factors. For specific health concerns, consult a qualified health professional or contact your local water utility. See our Terms of Use.