Chum Creek vs Healesville
Side-by-side tap water quality comparison
Which suburb has better water?
It's very close! Chum Creek scores 9.6/10 and Healesville scores 9.6/10. Both suburbs have similar water quality based on ADWG compliance data.
Visual comparison
Key metrics comparison
Full water quality comparison
All parameters compared against Australian Drinking Water Guidelines (ADWG)
| Parameter | Chum Creek | Healesville | Unit | ADWG Guideline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aluminium | 0.011 Good | 0.011 Good | mg/L | < 0.2 |
| Copper | 0.007 Good | 0.007 Good | mg/L | < 2 |
| E. coli | 0 Compliant | 0 Compliant | MPN/100mL | < 0 |
| Free Chlorine | 0.5 Good | 0.5 Good | mg/L | < 5 |
| Hardness | 8 Good | 8 Good | mg/L CaCO3 | < 200 |
| Iron | 0.019 Good | 0.019 Good | mg/L | < 0.3 |
| Lead | 0.0003 Good | 0.0003 Good | mg/L | < 0.01 |
| pH | 7.3 Normal | 7.3 Normal | pH units | 6.5 – 8.5 |
| Trihalomethanes | 0.04 Good | 0.04 Good | mg/L | < 0.25 |
| Turbidity | 3.02 Good | 3.02 Good | NTU | < 5 |
| Zinc | 0.025 Measured | 0.025 Measured | mg/L | No limit |
Explore further
Disclaimer: This comparison is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice or professional guidance. Data is sourced from Yarra Valley Water. Values shown are based on the most recent published water quality reports and may not reflect real-time conditions at your tap. Water quality can vary due to local plumbing, seasonal changes, and other factors. For specific health concerns, consult a qualified health professional or contact your local water utility. See our Terms of Use.