Langs Landing vs Swan Reach

Name: Water Quality Comparison: Langs Landing vs Swan Reach
Creator: WaterScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Side-by-side tap water quality comparison

Swan Reach, SA

9.1

Quality Score

Supplied by SA Water

Share this page Twitter Facebook LinkedIn

Which suburb has better water?

It's very close! Langs Landing scores 9.1/10 and Swan Reach scores 9.1/10. Both suburbs have similar water quality based on ADWG compliance data.

As an Amazon Associate, WaterScore earns from qualifying purchases. We may also earn from other affiliate links on this page — this doesn't affect our recommendations.

Recommended for this suburb

Chlorine in Langs Landing is 0.9 mg/L — above the taste threshold. That pool smell in every glass is real.

Chlorine is added on purpose (kills bugs in the pipes), but by the time it reaches your tap it ruins everything you taste. Tea takes on a medicinal edge. Kids turn down water and drink juice or soft drink instead. The usual family fix is bottled water, but a simple carbon filter is the cleaner daily habit. Worse, many filter pitchers go in the fridge and get ignored because they're slow.

BRITAOur pick

Marella 2.4L Fridge Water Filter Jug (Maxtra+)

4.7 · 16,095 ratings on Amazon

A BRITA Marella is the opposite: fast (2.4L, fills in under a minute), kid-friendly handle, fridge-door fit, replacement cartridges available everywhere in AU. Chlorine gone, taste clean, no plumber, no faff — this is the default answer for chlorine taste in Australia.

Kill the taste →

Sponsored Amazon link · we may earn a commission at no cost to you. Check Amazon for current price and availability.

Visual comparison

Langs Landing, SA

Swan Reach, SA

Key metrics comparison

Hardness (mg/L)

Langs Landing

73 Same

Swan Reach

73 Same

pH Level

Langs Landing

0.05 Outside range

Swan Reach

0.05 Outside range

Fluoride (mg/L)

Langs Landing

0.1 Same

Swan Reach

0.1 Same

Chlorine (mg/L)

Langs Landing

0.9 Same

Swan Reach

0.9 Same

Full water quality comparison

All parameters compared against Australian Drinking Water Guidelines (ADWG)

Parameter	Langs Landing	Swan Reach	Unit	ADWG Guideline
Alkalinity	73 Measured	73 Measured	mg/L	No limit
Aluminium	0.022 Good	0.022 Good	mg/L	< 0.2
Calcium	13.7 Measured	13.7 Measured	mg/L	No limit
Chloride	76 Good	76 Good	mg/L	< 250
Colour	1 Good	1 Good	HU	< 15
Copper	0.0264 Good	0.0264 Good	mg/L	< 2
E. coli	0 Compliant	0 Compliant	cfu/100mL	< 0
Fluoride	0.1 Good	0.1 Good	mg/L	< 1.5
Free Chlorine	0.9 Good	0.9 Good	mg/L	< 5
Hardness	73 Good	73 Good	PPM or mg/L	< 200
Iron	0.0112 Good	0.0112 Good	mg/L	< 0.3
Lead	0.0003 Good	0.0003 Good	mg/L	< 0.01
Magnesium	9.45 Measured	9.45 Measured	mg/L	No limit
Manganese	0.001 Good	0.001 Good	mg/L	< 0.1
Nitrate	0.53 Good	0.53 Good	mg/L	< 50
pH	0.05 Outside range	0.05 Outside range	µg/L	6.5 – 8.5
Sodium	50.7 Good	50.7 Good	mg/L	< 180
Sulfate	15.6 Good	15.6 Good	mg/L	< 500
Total Chlorine	1 Good	1 Good	mg/L	< 5
Total Dissolved Solids	254 Good	254 Good	mg/L	< 600
Turbidity	0.1 Good	0.1 Good	NTU	< 5

Explore further

Langs Landing

Swan Reach

Disclaimer: This comparison is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice or professional guidance. Data is sourced from SA Water. Values shown are based on the most recent published water quality reports and may not reflect real-time conditions at your tap. Water quality can vary due to local plumbing, seasonal changes, and other factors. For specific health concerns, consult a qualified health professional or contact your local water utility. See our Terms of Use.