Cossack vs Pine Creek

Name: Water Quality Comparison: Cossack vs Pine Creek
Creator: WaterScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Side-by-side tap water quality comparison

Cossack, NT

9.4

Quality Score

Supplied by Power and Water Corporation

Pine Creek, NT

9.4

Quality Score

Supplied by Power and Water Corporation

Share this page Twitter Facebook LinkedIn

Which suburb has better water?

It's very close! Cossack scores 9.4/10 and Pine Creek scores 9.4/10. Both suburbs have similar water quality based on ADWG compliance data.

As an Amazon Associate, WaterScore earns from qualifying purchases. We may also earn from other affiliate links on this page — this doesn't affect our recommendations.

Recommended for this suburb

Chlorine in Cossack is 2 mg/L — that's high. It's why your tap water smells like a pool.

Chlorine is added on purpose (kills bugs in the pipes), but by the time it reaches your tap it ruins everything you taste. Tea takes on a medicinal edge. Kids turn down water and drink juice or soft drink instead. The usual family fix is bottled water, but a simple carbon filter is the cleaner daily habit. Worse, many filter pitchers go in the fridge and get ignored because they're slow.

BRITAOur pick

Marella 2.4L Fridge Water Filter Jug (Maxtra+)

4.7 · 16,095 ratings on Amazon

A BRITA Marella is the opposite: fast (2.4L, fills in under a minute), kid-friendly handle, fridge-door fit, replacement cartridges available everywhere in AU. Chlorine gone, taste clean, no plumber, no faff — this is the default answer for chlorine taste in Australia.

Kill the taste →

Sponsored Amazon link · we may earn a commission at no cost to you. Check Amazon for current price and availability.

Visual comparison

Cossack, NT

Pine Creek, NT

Key metrics comparison

Hardness (mg/L)

Cossack

110 Higher

Pine Creek

102 Lower

pH Level

Cossack

7.7 Normal

Pine Creek

7 Normal

Fluoride (mg/L)

Cossack

0.67 Higher

Pine Creek

0.58 Lower

Chlorine (mg/L)

Cossack

2 Same

Pine Creek

2 Same

Full water quality comparison

All parameters compared against Australian Drinking Water Guidelines (ADWG)

Parameter	Cossack	Pine Creek	Unit	ADWG Guideline
Alkalinity	70 Measured	96 Measured	mg/L CaCO3	No limit
Aluminium	0.02 Good	0.02 Good	mg/L	< 0.2
Calcium	0.003 Measured	0.018 Measured	mg/L	No limit
Chloride	7 Good	11 Good	mg/L	< 250
Colour	2 Good	2 Good	HU	< 15
Conductivity	7.4 Measured	7 Measured	µS/cm	No limit
Copper	0.1 Good	0.1 Good	mg/L	< 2
Fluoride	0.67 Good	0.58 Good	mg/L	< 1.5
Free Chlorine	1.9 Good	1.2 Good	mg/L	< 5
Hardness	110 Good	102 Good	mg/L CaCO3	< 200
Iron	0.01 Good	0.01 Good	mg/L	< 0.3
Magnesium	15 Measured	48 Measured	mg/L	No limit
Manganese	0.005 Good	0.015 Good	mg/L	< 0.1
pH	7.7 Normal	7 Normal	pH units	6.5 – 8.5
Sulfate	0.039 Good	0.003 Good	mg/L	< 500
Total Chlorine	2 Good	2 Good	mg/L	< 5
Total Dissolved Solids	5 Good	7 Good	mg/L	< 600
Turbidity	1.4 Good	1.2 Good	NTU	< 5
Zinc	0.025 Measured	0.023 Measured	mg/L	No limit

Explore further

Cossack

Pine Creek

Disclaimer: This comparison is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice or professional guidance. Data is sourced from Power and Water Corporation. Values shown are based on the most recent published water quality reports and may not reflect real-time conditions at your tap. Water quality can vary due to local plumbing, seasonal changes, and other factors. For specific health concerns, consult a qualified health professional or contact your local water utility. See our Terms of Use.