Lucindale vs Wrattonbully

Name: Water Quality Comparison: Lucindale vs Wrattonbully
Creator: WaterScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Side-by-side tap water quality comparison

Wrattonbully, SA

8.0

Quality Score

Supplied by SA Water

Share this page Twitter Facebook LinkedIn

Which suburb has better water?

Lucindale has better water quality with a score of 9.1/10 compared to Wrattonbully's 8.0/10. Lucindale has softer water (319 vs 355 mg/L).

Based on ADWG compliance across all measured parameters. Both suburbs receive treated, safe drinking water.

As an Amazon Associate, WaterScore earns from qualifying purchases. We may also earn from other affiliate links on this page — this doesn't affect our recommendations.

Recommended for this suburb

Wrattonbully's tap water is 'very hard' at 355 mg/L — and scale is building up in your home right now.

Every time you boil a kettle or run the hot tap, calcium is baking onto heating elements. Hot water systems, dishwashers, coffee machines, shower screens and glassware all take the same damage. "Descaler tablets" treat the symptom; they don't stop the mineral from entering your home in the first place.

iSpringOur pick

RCC7AK 6-Stage Under-Sink RO (with Alkaline Re-min)

4.6 · 13,756 ratings on Amazon

A reverse-osmosis system blocks 95%+ of dissolved minerals before the water reaches your tap. No plumber needed — it fits under the kitchen sink in a Saturday. The drinking water, ice, tea and coffee all taste clean for the first time. Reducing scale at the tap helps protect the appliances you use every day.

Stop the scale →

Sponsored Amazon link · we may earn a commission at no cost to you. Check Amazon for current price and availability.

Visual comparison

Lucindale, SA

Wrattonbully, SA

Key metrics comparison

Hardness (mg/L)

Lucindale

319 Lower

Wrattonbully

355 Higher

pH Level

Lucindale

7.6 Normal

Wrattonbully

—

Fluoride (mg/L)

Lucindale

0.3 Lower

Wrattonbully

1.1 Higher

Chlorine (mg/L)

Lucindale

0.8 Lower

Wrattonbully

0.9 Higher

Full water quality comparison

All parameters compared against Australian Drinking Water Guidelines (ADWG)

Parameter	Lucindale	Wrattonbully	Unit	ADWG Guideline
Alkalinity	318 Measured	317 Measured	mg/L	No limit
Aluminium	0.001 Good	0.001 Good	mg/L	< 0.2
Calcium	77 Measured	61.2 Measured	mg/L	No limit
Chloride	276 Exceeds	458 Exceeds	mg/L	< 250
Colour	1 Good	1 Good	HU	< 15
Copper	0.0216 Good	0.2176 Good	mg/L	< 2
E. coli	0 Compliant	0 Compliant	cfu/100mL	< 0
Fluoride	0.3 Good	1.1 Good	mg/L	< 1.5
Free Chlorine	0.8 Good	0.9 Good	mg/L	< 5
Hardness	319 Exceeds	355 Exceeds	PPM or mg/L	< 200
Iron	0.0074 Good	0.103 Good	mg/L	< 0.3
Lead	0.0008 Good	0.0006 Good	mg/L	< 0.01
Magnesium	30.7 Measured	49.1 Measured	mg/L	No limit
Manganese	0.0001 Good	0.0233 Good	mg/L	< 0.1
Nitrate	0.04 Good	0.12 Good	mg/L	< 50
pH	7.6 Normal	—	pH units	6.5 – 8.5
Sodium	167 Near limit	326 Exceeds	mg/L	< 180
Sulfate	9.5 Good	129.8 Good	mg/L	< 500
Total Dissolved Solids	819 Exceeds	—	mg/L	< 600
Turbidity	0.1 Good	0.48 Good	NTU	< 5

Explore further

Lucindale

Wrattonbully

Disclaimer: This comparison is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice or professional guidance. Data is sourced from SA Water. Values shown are based on the most recent published water quality reports and may not reflect real-time conditions at your tap. Water quality can vary due to local plumbing, seasonal changes, and other factors. For specific health concerns, consult a qualified health professional or contact your local water utility. See our Terms of Use.